Do i believe in God?
..a belief in God requires a belief and a trust, as well as an understanding, in and of the means that taught of his existence.
Therein lies the crux of the God problem. Religion itself as a vehicle for belief.
I would argue that for any religion to have credibility (in all senses) that it should meet certain criteria all of which can be covered by the term 'life supporting'. That is, any religion could be considered a genuine religion as opposed to simply a belief system masquerading as a religion. However genuine religions are also belief systems.
I would also argue that if there is a supreme being there must by definition be only one, therefore all genuine religions must be different expressions of the same ultimate reality.
The following criteria would seem to me to be essential in the definition of a genuine religion; so, in no particular order and tautologically inclusive:
[*]
Ahimsa as an overarching principle that is repeated below.
[*]
Compassion toward others.
[*]
Respect for the religious beliefs and customs of others.
[*]
Doing no harm to others.
[*]
The acceptance of all other races as equal.
[*]
Forgiveness. I would qualify this by saying that such forgiveness is not the bestowed forgiveness of any perceived God, but rather the forgiveness of man towards man.
[/list]This brings us to very the origin of any religion and that usually, (but not always) stems from a single teacher and that teacher is invariably 'enlightened' in a spiritual sense. Enlightenment in this sense is a very interesting concept as it refers to someone who has in some way transcended the normal understanding of the phenomenal world and has become 'one' with the underlying reality that supports all existence. So, do/did these 'enlightened' people really have a genuine experience or were they just delusional?
In the Hindu, Buddhist and Jain religions, the pursuit of 'enlightenment' is the very purpose of man's existence. Christ was enlightened. Buddha was 'enlightened' Hinduism has a long tradition of 'enlightened' individuals such as Ramana Mahrshi https://en.wikipedia...Ramana_Maharshi
In the present climate Islam merits a special mention. I'm not sure where the Prophet Mohamed comes in relation to enlightenment, but, the Sufi Mystics http://http://www.ag..._mysticism.html certainly believed it was possible to have a direct experience of God. When correctly interpreted Islam teaches that the rights of all should be protected, that individuals of all belief systems should be allowed to hold and convey their opinions without the threat or intimidation. Apostasy is man's invention not God's, as a form of control, and is not part of Islam. And, interestingly Mohammed said
"There will come a time upon the people when nothing will remain of Islam except its name only and nothing will remain of the Qur'an except its inscription. Their mosques will be splendidly furnished but destitute of guidance. Their divines will be the worst people under the heaven and strife will issue from and avert to them." (Mishkat, Kitab al-'Ilm; Kanz al-'Ummal, 6:43).
The point I'm making is that underlying all religion of value is an alleged universal truth, an alleged reality which though it exists is beyond the understanding of ordinary men, but has nevertheless allegedly been revealed to a few 'worthy' individuals. This 'understanding' is theoretically available to anyone who has sufficient desire for it.
All religious texts emanating from an 'enlightened' teacher are a 'map' of how to get 'there'. This, is where all problems arise. If you can't read/understand the map, you end up in the wrong place. Then there are those (many) who for selfish reasons start by deciding where they want 'there' to be and then, deliberately manipulate and misread the map for their own ends.
Good afternoon Sir. 
I couldn't agree more with you, nicely written (as one would expect from your good self).
Indeed religions are primarily belief systems but (and it's a big 'but') i believe those systems to be the first step and once that first and most important (arguably) step is taken and made steady, the engineering core of all that lays beyond is life confirming (and agreed, supporting) through the further steps of life's beginning, middle and end (and the balance of all three). It initially seemed a paradox to me that death is the greatest giver (teacher) of life but as both are differing sides to the same coin, their interconnected value is obvious really.
I found (or feel) that religions were basically, fundamentally, trying to put in to words (metaphors) the voice which the cycle of nature and the intricate systems that micro manage every single simple system held in the perfect universal balance, already spoke with. I found that in order to look 'out' and beyond, on to understand, one must start first by looking 'back' and within. The human body itself is an intricate balance of harmonious systems, systems all capable of compromising each other but in balance, all complimenting one another in an order that makes the whole. A direct reflection of both the universe complete and, back even closer, mother nature herself and dare i say, the teachings of any worthy religion.
I found (or feel) that the lessons of belief, the fuel that runs the vehicle of the belief system, was not only before my eyes (night and day) but already beating and flowing back deep within me already. Couple the right direction to look with the right heart to digest, understand and compartmentalise and you have what the Bible would call....
..i want to stop there. Out of respect to our Mr casino and other believers that took a different road to perhaps what will eventually be the same destination, i feel i could become blasphemous and disrespectful and am not prepared to be so.
Every lesson, every gift, every foresight of hindsight is already before and within us, we don't need vocal vehicles, we need our own eyes and hearts (Sorry, this is beginning to sound like i'm preaching lol). I mean that nature/the animal kingdom (to concentrate on just those facets) hold the lessons of compassion and devotion, unity and selfless sacrifice as well as the cruelty and wild untamed abandonment of a ferocious singular anarchy and i think that our belief that we are superior to all is not the only but certainly one of the most rudimentary things, holding us back from important steps forward toward the enlightenment we seek.
Superiority, as a concept, is the thing that i have the biggest problem with comprehending and accepting, be it our superiority over everything mother nature and the universe has created through evolutionary journeys over billions and billions of years before we even took one step on ours (our self importance is staggering) or a superior being, as ultimately, ultimate superiority in itself is utter stagnation with an inability to progress farther and that is something that just doesn't, for want of a better word...fit (imho).
Debate, here, pivots on the fine edge of definition and the intended destination of my words may well be hijacked by our differing definitions of certain words i use, so with that in mind, i do hope that i have not insulted or hurt anyone in any way and also, that i have made at least some sense to someone, be it the former, then please accept my apologies.
My life, as my belief system (as it should be), is a work-in-progress, so these moments are precious...nice to chat Mr oblomov
The warmest of regards and wishes...
..icey 
A 'PS' plucked from the paragraphs above...
[Old Hippy Alert]
Mankind's self awareness has been banded and branded as that which separates and lifts him above the rest of the animal kingdom, a self awareness rope that i believe he then hangs himself with in the process. I do have to kick myself for being naughty as i stifle a snigger, when i hear very kind hearted and well meaning people shine in self-righteous emblazoned pride as they 'save the planet' (in an oxymoron with progress), for true self awareness would nullify the equation (don't get me started lol). It is our 'progress' which damages our environment and cleaning up after (or before) ourselves is a social and environmental prerequisite to progress, not something to pat ourselves on the back for once the horses have bolted (another lesson from mother nature that we should be learning).
It is we who are the infestation, the living breathing planet the host and attrition by illness and disease the weapon nature has to combat our sheer numbers. We, being our own worse enemy, of course aid in mother nature's war to keep balance but then we would do well to remember that life itself is a battle to survive another day, right from the first moment of conception. When one is fighting to the death (as inevitably we all are) one weapon of mass destruction is very much the same as another. The fatal blow and how it was dealt, should not be our main focus through the campaign we wage (we may or may not be inadvertently drafted as such for another), it should be how we choose to conduct ourselves (for it is that choice and the freedom of ability to execute it, that supposedly separates us from the so called 'inferior kingdoms'). But (can one start a sentence with 'but'?) rather we fight our natural instincts and try to change the rules to fit our own visions of what is important, which is a tool of progress i suppose and it is only to be expected that individual importance differs from that of the whole but, to me, my natural instincts (by which i live by) tell me that the 'state' in which we return the life-force we borrow back to the balance, is the only thing of real importance (of course a little fun along the way is always nice lol). [/Old Hippy Alert]