By lower I should of specified lower than the standard A/F mix burn so you should still be able to adjust successfully for any over fueling.Not related really but still interesting.... as you adjust the fuel levels lower with the SAFC-2 the ECU will start to detect the change (through its primary 02 sensor I believe - you can measure this change with a voltmeter) and will compensate by increasing the injectors fueling cycle
Ah, damn. I thought this wasn't a problem due to the way the SAFC fakes the MAP signal into the ECU...

Apexi Safc-2 Installation
#61
Posted 23 December 2005 - 04:18 PM
#62
Posted 02 January 2006 - 07:45 PM

Here is a snapshot of my first log.
Key
Purple: Lambda (O2)
Black: RPM
Red: Throttle position
Green: MAP sensor output (SAFC-2 input)
Blue: SAFC-2 output to ECU
Attached Files
Edited by speedster, 02 January 2006 - 08:01 PM.
#63
Posted 02 January 2006 - 09:26 PM
Attached Files
Edited by speedster, 02 January 2006 - 09:28 PM.
#64
Posted 02 January 2006 - 09:43 PM
Attached Files
#65
Posted 02 January 2006 - 09:52 PM
Attached Files
#66
Posted 02 January 2006 - 10:18 PM

#67
Posted 02 January 2006 - 11:17 PM
Attached Files
#68
Posted 03 January 2006 - 09:45 AM
I take it that AFR spike to 22:1 was a glitch?!AFR and RPM only


#69
Posted 03 January 2006 - 10:09 AM

#70
Posted 03 January 2006 - 06:37 PM
#71
Posted 03 January 2006 - 08:38 PM
Yes, it is a piggyback - it works in conjunction with the cars standard ECU.Sorry to be a Pillock but..................
What exactly does this piece of kit do?
Is it a more sophisticated ECU?
Does it work in conjunction with the Standard ECU?
Benefit for Modified cars only?
My NA is full stage II so just interested in any 'improvements'
Cheers.
Essentially the SAFC-2 allows you to manage what air pressure the ECU registers over 12 points along the RPM range, for both low and high level throttle positions - that means you have 24 control points in total.
For example if the air pressure at 5500 RPM on full throttle produces 4.5 volts from the MAP sensor the SAFC-2 could be programmed at this RPM + throttle position (high) to supply the ECU with 3.8 volts (you substract or add to the ECU MAP sensor reading by percentage points, up to 50%, either way to a min. of 0 volts and a max. of 5 volts). This means you get some control on the amount of fuel the ECU supplies via the injectors because air pressure is part of the algorithm utilised by the ECU in determining the Air Fuel mix required by the engine. In the above example the Air Fuel Ratio (AFR) would be leaner than the AFR the ECU normally supplies to the engine.
In summary with this modification you are forcing the MAP sensor output through a filter (the SAFC-2) which alters what the cars ECU sees at its MAP sensor input.
Usually such equipment is useful only on modified cars. If you have a full stage two and if your fuel map was created by a vendor with all the necessary equipment (rolling road, gas analyzers, etc.) and assuming they allocated your car the necessary time to get the job done right, then the SAFC-2 may not be any addition. I am using it because I have have no option but to do the AFR tuning myself (plus I enjoy it).
The LM-1 kit (software screenshots above) is used to monitor and record how the car is burning the air/fuel mix via a wideband O2 sensor. A wideband is a more accurate sensor than the standard item. In our case the wideband can be used to replace the O2 sensor after the CAT (replace the standard sensor with an O2 sim to prevent an EML) though a CAT will effect the sensor reading, making it a little leaner.
Monitoring and logging additional sensors inputs like throttle position (TPS), RPM etc. allows you to determine how well the car is making power and provides the necessary data for you to sit down and calculate improvements.
Used together one should be able to get a fueling map which works well with current and any future modifications.
The SAFC-2 is a rather primitive form of A/F management but it does get the job done and I am finding it a useful tool to learn the basics.
Hope this helps

Anybody, feel free to correct me if you think I got something wrong.
Edited by speedster, 03 January 2006 - 08:42 PM.
#72
Posted 03 January 2006 - 09:00 PM
#73
Posted 03 January 2006 - 09:08 PM

Edited by speedster, 03 January 2006 - 09:21 PM.
#74
Posted 03 January 2006 - 09:28 PM
Hi cicastol, I am using 5 in and 5 out for the sensor number. I managed to get my hands on an oscilloscope. When I get some leads, duh!GREAT!!!
![]()
This week finally, i will install the safc,but i've removed the rear clam waiting for the 68mm TB ,so until next month i can't test it!!
You use 04 in & 04 out sensor number??

#75
Posted 03 January 2006 - 10:14 PM
Now i'm in the SAFC club,installed today!!Hi cicastol, I am using 5 in and 5 out for the sensor number. I managed to get my hands on an oscilloscope. When I get some leads, duh!
I will trace both the actual MAP output and supplied SAFC-2 outputs, to determine if the SAFC-2 is supplying anything different in terms of waveform.


All works great,i've tryed different sensor number from 1 to 7 ,if you check in monitor the value displayed(pressure) change with different sensor number(engine off, maximum pressure in the intake=air pressure) from 1 to 7 best is 5,tomorrow i will try all the sensor numbering to 20 watching for the more accurate reading of the pressure!!
Thanks very much for the reference wiring diagram that you made,hope hat someone put it in the DIY guide!!



#76
Posted 04 January 2006 - 09:17 AM
In our case the wideband can be used to replace the O2 sensor after the CAT (replace the standard sensor with an O2 sim to prevent an EML) though a CAT will effect the sensor reading, making it a little leaner.
Thats the wrong sensor to change isn't it? Don't you need to be reading the o2 levels *before* the cat to see what the engine AF ratio truely is?
Cheers, Paul.
#77
Posted 04 January 2006 - 10:31 AM
Yes, the correct sensor is the Pre CAT sensor but you cannot remove the standard sensor as the car's ECU utilises this for it's A/F reading. Using the post CAT sensor is workable but you need to understand that the AFR readings will be a little leaner that the actual values. Of course if you have removed the CAT none of this matters.In our case the wideband can be used to replace the O2 sensor after the CAT (replace the standard sensor with an O2 sim to prevent an EML) though a CAT will effect the sensor reading, making it a little leaner.
Thats the wrong sensor to change isn't it? Don't you need to be reading the o2 levels *before* the cat to see what the engine AF ratio truely is?
Cheers, Paul.
I am thinking of enquiring with Milltek if they could put a Cell 100 CAT on a down pipe for me with two O2 sensor ports prior to the CAT.
#78
Posted 04 January 2006 - 03:20 PM
#79
Posted 04 January 2006 - 08:00 PM
Attached Files
#80
Posted 04 January 2006 - 08:35 PM



0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users