Jump to content


Photo

High-spec Na 2.2 Screamer


  • Please log in to reply
83 replies to this topic

#21 vocky

vocky

    Moderator

  • 11,969 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:02 PM

thats the shizzle adam!

now the question is can i hook that up to my m62? :lol:

(i can picture vocky shaking his head :lol: )

you would need to remove the m62 and fit a 2.4 inlet manifold for the rotrex :rolleyes:

#22 The Batman

The Batman

    Super Moderator

  • 30,267 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:FLD mum's bed

Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:05 PM

can i not modify the inlet manifold for a hole in the bottom for twin superchargers?! :lol:

#23 vocky

vocky

    Moderator

  • 11,969 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:09 PM

twin sc's :rolleyes:

#24 The Batman

The Batman

    Super Moderator

  • 30,267 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:FLD mum's bed

Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:10 PM

:lol:

#25 southpaw

southpaw

    sans vx for now

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,462 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southampton

Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:36 PM

ot but what is the advantage of the rotrex £s/weight/bhp?

#26 The Batman

The Batman

    Super Moderator

  • 30,267 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:FLD mum's bed

Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:38 PM

you will have to wait until the guinea pig is finished ;)

#27 mandarinvx

mandarinvx

    King of First Replies

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,621 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Mids / Oxfordshire

Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:44 PM

ot but what is the advantage of the rotrex £s/weight/bhp?

I think the charger itself is more expensive, but money is saved on other aspects, overall may be cheaper :unsure:

The 30 only weighs 5kg, if that's the one to be used, with no seperate cast manifold

No idea what BHP - the C30-74 is capable of 150-300bhp; the C30-84 is 200-320bhp; and the C30-94 is 250-400bhp. Tho the C30 is their off-the-shelf design, it may be possible to spec a custom one

#28 The Batman

The Batman

    Super Moderator

  • 30,267 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:FLD mum's bed

Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:46 PM

does anyone want a c30-94? ;)

#29 Muncher

Muncher

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,494 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ipswich

Posted 07 June 2009 - 04:16 PM

Be patient and wait for the manifold to come in, it's worth the wait.

#30 fiveoclock

fiveoclock

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,453 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ifold, West Sussex

Posted 07 June 2009 - 04:27 PM

Be patient and wait for the manifold to come in, it's worth the wait.


Thanks, thats exactly what I'll do, just hope its not too long.

#31 Winstar

Winstar

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,264 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield

Posted 07 June 2009 - 04:30 PM

ot but what is the advantage of the rotrex £s/weight/bhp?

I think the charger itself is more expensive, but money is saved on other aspects, overall may be cheaper :unsure:

The 30 only weighs 5kg, if that's the one to be used, with no seperate cast manifold

No idea what BHP - the C30-74 is capable of 150-300bhp; the C30-84 is 200-320bhp; and the C30-94 is 250-400bhp. Tho the C30 is their off-the-shelf design, it may be possible to spec a custom one


rotrex are centrfugal compressors* which means they are far more efficient than even a harrop so less parasitic loss and less cooling required. However they would only mak sense if you where either going make a cheap sc conversion that made 250 - 260 bhp without charge cooling or make a 400bhp monster using a C30-94 which has one of the best compressor designs available.

*they are actually Holset, my old company, compressor stages mated up with rotrex's epicyclic gearing.

#32 Retset

Retset

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,766 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somerset

Posted 07 June 2009 - 05:25 PM

I reckon a Rotrex aiming for 240bhp using just a side pod mounted intercooler should be just about perfect ;)

#33 The Batman

The Batman

    Super Moderator

  • 30,267 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:FLD mum's bed

Posted 07 June 2009 - 05:28 PM

i thought the reason why courtenays scrapped the idea of side mounting a intercooler in the side pod was because it wasnt cooling it enough? i think a couple of vx's had this setup :unsure: but was then scrapped for the charge cooler up front

#34 MMSB

MMSB

    Member

  • Pip
  • 178 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lisbon, Portugal

Posted 07 June 2009 - 07:48 PM

However they would only mak sense if you where either going make a cheap sc conversion that made 250 - 260 bhp without charge cooling or make a 400bhp monster using a C30-94 which has one of the best compressor designs available.


Can I ask why you would say that?

250-260 bhp would be more than enough for me, but I would think that with no chargecooler/intercooler you would only have that bhp for a short while, so no good for track driving, especially with high temperatures... Am I wrong?

#35 mandarinvx

mandarinvx

    King of First Replies

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,621 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Mids / Oxfordshire

Posted 07 June 2009 - 07:53 PM

i thought the reason why courtenays scrapped the idea of side mounting a intercooler in the side pod was because it wasnt cooling it enough?

i think a couple of vx's had this setup :unsure: but was then scrapped for the charge cooler up front

You may only need an oil cooler on a Rotrex setup, which could be side pod mounted

The Rotrex doesn't generate anywhere near as much heat as the GM / Harrop, so induction temps will be much lower anyhoo :)

#36 slindborg

slindborg

    The Bishop of Stortford

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,602 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:.

Posted 07 June 2009 - 07:54 PM

However they would only mak sense if you where either going make a cheap sc conversion that made 250 - 260 bhp without charge cooling or make a 400bhp monster using a C30-94 which has one of the best compressor designs available.


Can I ask why you would say that?

250-260 bhp would be more than enough for me, but I would think that with no chargecooler/intercooler you would only have that bhp for a short while, so no good for track driving, especially with high temperatures... Am I wrong?



I'd take Winstars advice rather well on that front ;)
since the rotrex isnt a complete heat generator like the hEaton then charge temps arent such an issue so you dont need to cool that and can swing it with decent fuelling and timing.

#37 rcvaughan

rcvaughan

    Ex-VXer

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,115 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California
  • Interests:Work cars: Play cars

Posted 07 June 2009 - 08:00 PM

I hear there is already such an engine in a vx220 Imnotworthy

apparently it has a 7900rpm limiter on a high compression engine with webcon throttle bodies, running between 220 and 240 bhp depending which rolling road you believe ;)


Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy Imnotworthy

7900PRM! :tt:

#38 MMSB

MMSB

    Member

  • Pip
  • 178 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lisbon, Portugal

Posted 07 June 2009 - 08:04 PM

However they would only mak sense if you where either going make a cheap sc conversion that made 250 - 260 bhp without charge cooling or make a 400bhp monster using a C30-94 which has one of the best compressor designs available.


Can I ask why you would say that?

250-260 bhp would be more than enough for me, but I would think that with no chargecooler/intercooler you would only have that bhp for a short while, so no good for track driving, especially with high temperatures... Am I wrong?



I'd take Winstars advice rather well on that front ;)
since the rotrex isnt a complete heat generator like the hEaton then charge temps arent such an issue so you dont need to cool that and can swing it with decent fuelling and timing.


Oh, I didn't mean too look like I was doubting his advise, I realise from his posts that he knows very well what he talks about!

My question was just because I am looking to get some more ou of my engine but want to track it, so a cheaper S/C setup would be perfect for me if it did "take the heat"

Courtenays themselves aknowledge that their Stage 1 conversion would not resist track use, hence my question...

#39 slindborg

slindborg

    The Bishop of Stortford

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,602 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:.

Posted 07 June 2009 - 08:10 PM

no where that I know of has a rotrexed VX on the road as yet. I'm sure there are a few in the pipeline though as its pretty much a DUHHHHHHHHH option over the hEaton. So it wont be a simple drive in drive out option at the "tuners" yet.

#40 Muncher

Muncher

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,494 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ipswich

Posted 07 June 2009 - 08:28 PM

How would the boost and torque graphs differ between an M62/Harrop and a Rotrex? I was led to believe the power delivery/driveablity characteristics were not as good on a Rotrex charger.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users