you would need to remove the m62 and fit a 2.4 inlet manifold for the rotrexthats the shizzle adam!
now the question is can i hook that up to my m62?
(i can picture vocky shaking his head)

Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:02 PM
you would need to remove the m62 and fit a 2.4 inlet manifold for the rotrexthats the shizzle adam!
now the question is can i hook that up to my m62?
(i can picture vocky shaking his head)
Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:05 PM
Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:09 PM
Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:10 PM
Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:36 PM
Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:38 PM
Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:44 PM
I think the charger itself is more expensive, but money is saved on other aspects, overall may be cheaperot but what is the advantage of the rotrex £s/weight/bhp?
Posted 07 June 2009 - 03:46 PM
Posted 07 June 2009 - 04:16 PM
Posted 07 June 2009 - 04:27 PM
Be patient and wait for the manifold to come in, it's worth the wait.
Posted 07 June 2009 - 04:30 PM
I think the charger itself is more expensive, but money is saved on other aspects, overall may be cheaperot but what is the advantage of the rotrex £s/weight/bhp?
The 30 only weighs 5kg, if that's the one to be used, with no seperate cast manifold
No idea what BHP - the C30-74 is capable of 150-300bhp; the C30-84 is 200-320bhp; and the C30-94 is 250-400bhp. Tho the C30 is their off-the-shelf design, it may be possible to spec a custom one
Posted 07 June 2009 - 05:25 PM
Posted 07 June 2009 - 05:28 PM
Posted 07 June 2009 - 07:48 PM
However they would only mak sense if you where either going make a cheap sc conversion that made 250 - 260 bhp without charge cooling or make a 400bhp monster using a C30-94 which has one of the best compressor designs available.
Posted 07 June 2009 - 07:53 PM
You may only need an oil cooler on a Rotrex setup, which could be side pod mountedi thought the reason why courtenays scrapped the idea of side mounting a intercooler in the side pod was because it wasnt cooling it enough?
i think a couple of vx's had this setupbut was then scrapped for the charge cooler up front
Posted 07 June 2009 - 07:54 PM
However they would only mak sense if you where either going make a cheap sc conversion that made 250 - 260 bhp without charge cooling or make a 400bhp monster using a C30-94 which has one of the best compressor designs available.
Can I ask why you would say that?
250-260 bhp would be more than enough for me, but I would think that with no chargecooler/intercooler you would only have that bhp for a short while, so no good for track driving, especially with high temperatures... Am I wrong?
Posted 07 June 2009 - 08:00 PM
I hear there is already such an engine in a vx220
![]()
apparently it has a 7900rpm limiter on a high compression engine with webcon throttle bodies, running between 220 and 240 bhp depending which rolling road you believe
Posted 07 June 2009 - 08:04 PM
However they would only mak sense if you where either going make a cheap sc conversion that made 250 - 260 bhp without charge cooling or make a 400bhp monster using a C30-94 which has one of the best compressor designs available.
Can I ask why you would say that?
250-260 bhp would be more than enough for me, but I would think that with no chargecooler/intercooler you would only have that bhp for a short while, so no good for track driving, especially with high temperatures... Am I wrong?
I'd take Winstars advice rather well on that front![]()
since the rotrex isnt a complete heat generator like the hEaton then charge temps arent such an issue so you dont need to cool that and can swing it with decent fuelling and timing.
Posted 07 June 2009 - 08:10 PM
Posted 07 June 2009 - 08:28 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users