
Vxt Dyno Shock!
#61
Posted 22 March 2017 - 06:39 PM
#62
Posted 22 March 2017 - 07:18 PM
Edited by LordRagnar, 22 March 2017 - 07:19 PM.
#63
Posted 22 March 2017 - 07:40 PM
#64
Posted 22 March 2017 - 07:47 PM

#65
Posted 22 March 2017 - 07:58 PM
#66
Posted 22 March 2017 - 08:07 PM
I'd say 300lb ft is about spot on to be honest, always worth taking dyno figures with a pinch of salt though
#67
Posted 22 March 2017 - 08:09 PM
Is 300lbs/ft not quite a high figure considering the power is 'only' 238hp? 300 is more in the region of a stage 4 car and would normally need a uprated clutch. 238bhp is more like a stage 1.5 ish so would expect torque in the region of 240 -250. (Based on Courtenays Sport tuning figures.
#68
Posted 22 March 2017 - 08:31 PM
#69
Posted 22 March 2017 - 08:55 PM
I can confirm 100% that the ABS can interfere with bhp reading on a dyno
My car was on the dyno 3 weeks ago and wouldnt make over 228bhp yet the fuel and mapping said totally different. The mapper rabbid (rich) said this happens on the Astra's sometimes pop the ABS fuse.
I looked at him and was like yeah right. Anyway I removed the fuse changed nothing on the car/map and instantly pulled 268bhp without touching anything.
I cant remember why but its something to do with ABS and being on the dyno and the ecu does something that effects the power or timing
Makes no difference on the road just on the dyno
Edited by scw02102, 22 March 2017 - 09:02 PM.
#70
Posted 22 March 2017 - 08:58 PM
Is 300lbs/ft not quite a high figure considering the power is 'only' 238hp? 300 is more in the region of a stage 4 car and would normally need a uprated clutch. 238bhp is more like a stage 1.5 ish so would expect torque in the region of 240 -250. (Based on Courtenays Sport tuning figures.
This dyno is an accurate one I dyno at this one and 3 days before at Courtney Sport.
Courtney was over reading by 20bhp so a 238bhp on this rollers is well over 250bhp at CS
I also know a car that made 404bhp on one rollers yet only 350bhp on the above rollers.
#71
Posted 22 March 2017 - 09:21 PM
#72
Posted 22 March 2017 - 09:22 PM
Not a grammar issue, more that canbus is a diabolical marketing term for plain ole CANWhat's wrong with canbus:-) Was it my grammar :-) I went to a Welsh school so they didn't do me any favours , Assuming im the newbie you refer to .

#73
Posted 22 March 2017 - 10:30 PM
#74
Posted 22 March 2017 - 10:39 PM

Defo 300lbs/ft
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#75
Posted 22 March 2017 - 10:39 PM

Defo 300lbs/ft
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#76
Posted 22 March 2017 - 10:40 PM
#77
Posted 22 March 2017 - 10:59 PM
#78
Posted 22 March 2017 - 11:19 PM
#79
Posted 22 March 2017 - 11:26 PM
Edited by chickendippers, 22 March 2017 - 11:27 PM.
#80
Posted 22 March 2017 - 11:36 PM
Me too. Logically i question the original readings.I'm thoroughly confused by this thread.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users