
Possible First Vx 2.4 Harrop 1900 Build
#121
Posted 10 July 2016 - 07:35 PM
#122
Posted 10 July 2016 - 07:42 PM
When i get the custom tank designs through I'll post them on here. Anyone who wants a tank at the same time let me know. It will be baffled and hold about 8 litres. My idea is the then put a flush fit 1.75" filler with a 51mm neck on the body work to make it really easy to fill etc. Level will also be easily visible through the vent/ear.That's a good idea. I have my PCV catch tank in that area but could easily be relocated.
#123
Posted 10 July 2016 - 07:58 PM

#124
Posted 10 July 2016 - 08:02 PM
Edited by Crabash, 10 July 2016 - 08:07 PM.
#125
Posted 10 July 2016 - 08:44 PM
Don't think vxr injectors will cut the mustard on this one chris
i was just making comment about the rev limit in general ,, not specifically on this build.
Edited by chris_uk, 10 July 2016 - 08:47 PM.
#126
Posted 10 July 2016 - 08:47 PM
where are you going to mount the pump?
#127
Posted 10 July 2016 - 08:48 PM
#128
Posted 10 July 2016 - 08:49 PM
Good stuff chris But there is a lot more to it than that you could have two similar car and the duty cycle could be 10% difference quite easily
which is why i said the limiting factor is the injectors...
#129
Posted 10 July 2016 - 08:49 PM
Think richard was talking about mounting the pump under the bracket/tankwhere are you going to mount the pump?
#130
Posted 10 July 2016 - 08:57 PM
Yep as Chris said the pump mounts directly under the bracketThink richard was talking about mounting the pump under the bracket/tankwhere are you going to mount the pump?
#131
Posted 10 July 2016 - 09:01 PM
ah right.
#132
Posted 14 July 2016 - 09:57 AM
70mm pulley atm.....this may change. And Dutch Ecu, soon to be upgraded to the pro version
Was re-reading your specs, but on page 1 you mentioned an underdive ATI crank pulley on there?
If fitted that will affect the SC-rpm by some 12% for the Ecotec UD pulley according ZZP info.
(makes your 70mm pulley act as a 78.4mm version...)
#133
Posted 15 July 2016 - 06:42 AM
70mm pulley atm.....this may change. And Dutch Ecu, soon to be upgraded to the pro version
Was re-reading your specs, but on page 1 you mentioned an underdive ATI crank pulley on there?
If fitted that will affect the SC-rpm by some 12% for the Ecotec UD pulley according ZZP info.
(makes your 70mm pulley act as a 78.4mm version...)
It was not fitted due to the fact it needs to be pressed onto the crank, my concern was how it could be removed again
To be honest I will never advise to fit one due to it being so tight into the oil pump gear. I measured the outside diameter and it was greater than a standard pulley - not ideal when the metal expands. After some serious track abuse (lots of heat) the oil pump gear might crack and thus kill the oil pressure. Be careful with them is my advice .....
Edit: it is running a 6 rib standard GM pulley
Edited by vocky, 15 July 2016 - 06:44 AM.
#134
Posted 31 July 2016 - 08:02 AM
#135
Posted 31 July 2016 - 09:36 AM
Custom MW50 tank is all designed and at the manufacturing stage now. Should have this early next week, it's got an inbuilt bracket to allow it to be mounted and sit in the right hand side pod with the pump bolted underneath. I will be able to offer these to anyone else who may want one but there not exactly cheap.....£150.
Will be interested to see the design of the tank. I need to fit one to the passenger side as i) my charge cooler pipework goes along the drivers sill and ii) with my lard arse in the drivers seat I need as much counterweight on the passenger side as possible and iii) a remote filler neck would be much easier to deal with on the passenger side away from spinning pulleys/belts. If they can do a mirror image of one, that would be perfect.
What capacity have you managed to make it?
#136
Posted 31 July 2016 - 10:01 AM
#137
Posted 31 July 2016 - 10:08 AM
Maybe ditching the meth also just run with H2O At least until we find some more detail about the Saab cracked block
running Darton liners
#138
Posted 31 July 2016 - 10:35 AM
You've got a new dyno sheet of this pull? Interested to compare with the 1st and to see what rpm it drops the power..
#139
Posted 31 July 2016 - 06:22 PM
You've got a new dyno sheet of this pull? Interested to compare with the 1st and to see what rpm it drops the power.. I have yes, I'll try remember tomorrow to overlay them and add a photo up on here
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users